AG-2024.06-375·quant-ph·cross-listed: gr-qchep-phhep-th
Covariant quantum field theory of tachyons is unphysical
Authors
- Krzysztof Jodłowski
Abstract
Tachyons have fascinated generations of physicists due to their peculiar behavior, but they did not solve any real physical problem. This may have changed with the recent works of Dragan et al., who have shown that superluminal observers may be related to the foundations of quantum mechanics (QM) because they require introducing non-determinism and wave-like behavior at the fundamental level. Unfortunately, we show that the tachyon quantum field theory proposed as a part of this program is not quantum since the tachyon field commutes at all points and the canonical commutations relations of a quantum scalar field are not satisfied. We also discuss other authors' theories, e.g., we show that the Dhar-Sudarshan's formula for the Feynman propagator violates unitarity, and we apply the LSZ formalism to tachyons for the first time, where we find that one cannot prove the LSZ asymptotic condition just by replacing plane waves with wavepackets.
Submitted
20 June 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2406.14225
Summary
A proposed quantum field theory of faster-than-light particles (tachyons) fails to be truly quantum because its fields don't satisfy the commutation relations required by quantum mechanics, undermining recent claims that tachyons could explain quantum behavior.
- The tachyon field theory by Dragan et al. doesn't actually commute correctly—a fatal flaw that violates the foundational rules of quantum field theory.
- Previous formulas for tachyon propagators (like Dhar-Sudarshan's) break unitarity, meaning probabilities don't add up to one, a requirement for any valid quantum theory.
- Standard tools for relating quantum field theory to measurable particles (LSZ formalism) don't extend to tachyons, suggesting they may be incompatible with quantum mechanics rather than explaining it.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.