AG-2024.06-637·math-ph·cross-listed: hep-th
Scattering of Vortices with Excited Normal Modes
Authors
- Steffen Krusch
- Morgan Rees
- Thomas Winyard
Abstract
We consider head-on collisions at critical coupling of vortices modelled by the Abelian-Higgs model. We investigate the 2-vortex scattering, whereby the vortices are excited by the shape mode causing fluctuations in the gauge-invariant quantities. When the vortices are excited with a sufficiently large amplitude the moduli space approximation fails, and we observe an interesting behaviour in which the vortices can become trapped in a quasi-bound state with multiple bounces. We perform a detailed investigation on the behaviour of these excited vortices and sample a phase space of solutions. Interestingly, we find a fractal structure dependent on the initial phase of the mode and velocity of the vortices.
Submitted
6 June 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2406.04164
Summary
When vortices (topological defects in quantum fields) collide head-on while vibrating in their natural resonance mode, they can get trapped bouncing back and forth, with the outcome showing surprising fractal patterns depending on initial conditions.
- Excited vortices behave very differently from quiet ones—vibrations can cause them to stick together temporarily in a bouncing state rather than scattering cleanly, breaking the standard theoretical approximation.
- The scattering outcomes follow a fractal pattern, meaning the sensitivity to initial conditions creates self-similar structure across different scales—a hallmark of chaotic dynamics in classical systems.
- This work reveals hidden complexity in vortex collisions that standard models miss, suggesting that accounting for internal oscillations is crucial for predicting real collision behavior.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.