AG-2024.07-1550·cs.LG·cross-listed: cs.AIphysics.geo-phquant-ph
Flood Prediction Using Classical and Quantum Machine Learning Models
Authors
- Marek Grzesiak
- Param Thakkar
Abstract
This study investigates the potential of quantum machine learning to improve flood forecasting we focus on daily flood events along Germany's Wupper River in 2023 our approach combines classical machine learning techniques with QML techniques this hybrid model leverages quantum properties like superposition and entanglement to achieve better accuracy and efficiency classical and QML models are compared based on training time accuracy and scalability results show that QML models offer competitive training times and improved prediction accuracy this research signifies a step towards utilizing quantum technologies for climate change adaptation we emphasize collaboration and continuous innovation to implement this model in real-world flood management ultimately enhancing global resilience against floods
Submitted
1 July 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2407.01001
Summary
Researchers combined classical and quantum machine learning to predict daily floods on Germany's Wupper River, finding that quantum models match classical speed while improving prediction accuracy.
- Quantum machine learning models trained faster and predicted floods more accurately than purely classical approaches when tested on real 2023 river data.
- The hybrid approach exploits quantum properties like superposition and entanglement to process flood-related patterns more efficiently, suggesting quantum computers could aid climate adaptation.
- The authors present this as a proof-of-concept for quantum technology in operational flood forecasting, though real-world deployment in emergency management remains an open challenge.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.