AG-2024.08-1005·hep-ph
Interference Resurrection of the $τ$ Dipole through Quantum Tomography
Authors
- Prisco Lo Chiatto
Abstract
Helicity selection rules can suppress the leading contributions from dimension-6 operators in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT), reducing sensitivity to potential new physics. This paper explores how the interference contributions from the $τ$ lepton's anomalous dipole moment are restored in different observable, in particular comparing the sensitivity to SMEFT operators of quantum information observables and more traditional spin correlations. We compute the sensitivity of various observables-including entanglement measures, Bell inequality violations, and quantum uncertainties-to new physics effects using Monte Carlo simulations. Spin correlation observables are found to outperform both the integrated cross-section and quantum information observables in sensitivity to both $CP$-conserving and -violating effects, improving the sensitivity to the scale of new physics by up to a factor of 3. Our results suggest that quantum information observables are suboptimal probes for resurrecting the interference, and more in general to disentangle the $CP$ properties of new physics
Submitted
8 August 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2408.04553
Summary
Physicists compared different ways to measure the tau lepton's anomalous properties to detect new physics, finding that traditional spin-correlation measurements outperform quantum information measures by up to 3×.
- Helicity selection rules can hide signals of new physics in particle decays, but interference effects from the tau lepton's anomalous dipole moment can be recovered by measuring the right observables.
- The study tested quantum information observables (entanglement, Bell inequalities) against classical spin correlations and found spin correlations are significantly better at detecting both CP-conserving and CP-violating new physics.
- This suggests that quantum information approaches, while theoretically interesting, are practically suboptimal for this search—a useful reality check for experimental design in high-energy physics.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.