AG-2024.08-316·astro-ph.CO·cross-listed: gr-qc
Average zero-expansion regions of the universe
Authors
- Jan J. Ostrowski
- Ismael Delgado Gaspar
Abstract
Persistent tensions in the $Λ$CDM cosmological model underline the importance of tests of its basic assumptions. One such potential test arises from the fact that the surface of zero expansion around the collapsing object with spherical symmetry is strictly related to the object's mass and the value of the cosmological constant. We propose a complementary probe relating the averaged zero-expansion volume to the mass and the background cosmological Hubble parameter. Using the relativistic Zel'dovich approximation we are able to relax the spherical symmetry assumption and hence obtain a more general test of cosmological dynamics. Alternatively, our method can serve as a test of compatibility of relativistic N-body simulations and the scalar, averaged Einstein's equations with the relativistic Zel'dovich approximation serving as a closure condition.
Submitted
20 August 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2408.10699
Summary
A new test of cosmology based on regions where cosmic expansion stops around collapsing matter, removing the spherical-symmetry assumption that limited previous tests.
- The paper identifies where expansion velocity becomes zero around massive structures—a quantity tied directly to mass, dark energy, and the expansion rate—as a new probe of cosmological models.
- By using the relativistic Zel'dovich approximation (a mathematical tool for tracking matter flows), the authors generalize this test beyond spherically symmetric objects to real, lumpy matter distributions.
- This method offers a way to validate numerical simulations of the universe and check whether general relativity's averaged equations are consistent with observations of real structure formation.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.