AG-2024.08-391·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.COhep-th
Lagrangian formulation of the Tsallis entropy
Authors
- Rocco D'Agostino
- Giuseppe Gaetano Luciano
Abstract
We investigate the gravitational origin of the Tsallis entropy, characterized by the nonadditive index $δ$. Utilizing Wald's formalism within the framework of $f(R)$ modified theories of gravity, we evaluate the entropy on the black hole horizon for constant curvature solutions to the spherically symmetric vacuum field equations. In so doing, we demonstrate that the Tsallis entropy can be effectively derived from a generalization of the Lagrangian $\mathcal{L}\propto R^{1+ε}$, where $ε=δ-1$ quantifies small deviations from general relativity. In conclusion, we examine the physical implications of our findings in light of cosmological observations and elaborate on the possibility of solving the thermodynamic instability of Schwarzschild black holes.
Submitted
24 August 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2408.13638
Summary
Physicists show that Tsallis entropy—a generalized form of entropy used in complex systems—naturally emerges from modified gravity theories, offering a potential explanation for black hole thermodynamic instabilities.
- Tsallis entropy, which violates standard additivity, can be derived from gravity theories where the Lagrangian depends on higher powers of spacetime curvature, bridging two seemingly unrelated frameworks.
- The derivation works for black holes with constant curvature and reveals that deviations from Einstein's gravity directly correspond to the nonadditive parameter characterizing Tsallis entropy.
- This result suggests modified gravity might resolve why Schwarzschild black holes appear thermodynamically unstable in standard theory, with implications for understanding black hole evaporation and early universe physics.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.