AG-2024.08-914·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-exhep-lat
Model Independent Tests of the Hadronic Vacuum Polarization Contribution to the Muon $g$$-$$2$
Authors
- Luca Di Luzio
- Alexander Keshavarzi
- Antonio Masiero
- Paride Paradisi
Abstract
The hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) contributions to the muon $g$$-$$2$ are the crucial quantity to resolve whether new physics is present or not in the comparison between the Standard Model (SM) prediction and experimental measurements at Fermilab. They are commonly and historically determined via dispersion relations using a vast catalogue of experimentally measured, low-energy $e^+e^-\to \,\rm{hadrons}$ cross section data as input. These dispersive estimates result in a SM prediction that exhibits a muon $g$$-$$2$ discrepancy of more than $5σ$ when compared to experiment. However, recent lattice QCD evaluations of the HVP and a new hadronic cross section measurement from the CMD-3 experiment favor a no-new-physics scenario and, therefore, exhibit a common tension with the previous $e^+e^-\to \,\rm{hadrons}$ data. This study explores the current and future implications of these two scenarios on other observables that are also sensitive to the HVP contributions in the hope that they may provide independent tests of the current tensions observed in the muon $g$$-$$2$.
Submitted
2 August 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2408.01123
Summary
The paper identifies tensions between different measurements of hadronic vacuum polarization—a quantum effect crucial for predicting the muon's magnetic moment—and proposes testing which measurement is correct using other physics observables sensitive to the same effect.
- Experiments and theory disagree on the muon's magnetic moment by over 5 standard deviations, with recent lattice QCD and CMD-3 data suggesting no new physics, contradicting older electron-positron collision data.
- The disagreement hinges on hadronic vacuum polarization, a fundamental quantum correction that can be measured multiple ways, and these methods currently give incompatible answers.
- The authors propose using other precision physics observables that depend on the same quantum effect to independently verify which measurement is correct, potentially resolving the discrepancy.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.