AG-2024.09-532·hep-th
Confining quantum field theories
Authors
- Dimitrios Metaxas
Abstract
It is widely believed, and axiomatically postulated in mathematical quantum field theory, that the vacuum is a unique vector state. The recent solution of the quantum Yang-Mills theory of the strong interaction revealed the presence of two vacua and a mixed quantum state. The second, confining vacuum, is an eigenstate of an auxiliary field, with a non-zero eigenvalue, as opposed to the zero eigenstate of the perturbative vacuum, and provides a new mechanism of scale generation. I show that this non-trivial vacuum structure implies confinement, in the sense that vacuum expectation values between states separated at large, space-like distances, tend to zero, whereas in ordinary quantum theories with a unique vacuum, they are known to satisfy the cluster decomposition principle, and tend to free, asymptotic states, at large separations. In a confined state, the correlation functions are zero at spacelike distances larger than the scale of the theory. Accordingly, they can be non-zero only along a timelike worldline (with an associated spacelike width). The theory is by construction unitary and Lorentz invariant, but the different vacua give a direct sum decomposition. Implications on determinism and causality, and generalizations of the confinement mechanism for theories with other symmetries and interactions are discussed. I argue that confinement, in the generalized sense, is a necessary (certainly not sufficient) condition for proposed theories of a conscious state. Also, I discuss the relation with the measurement postulate of quantum mechanics (when the ``observer" is merely a detector). I argue that confinement, in the strong interaction, is an important mechanism, similar to and possibly along with decoherence, for the measurement process.
Submitted
2 September 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2409.01168
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.