AG-2024.12-012·physics.hist-ph·cross-listed: gr-qchep-thquant-ph
Boundaries, frames and the issue of physical covariance
Authors
- Henrique Gomes
- Simon Langenscheidt
- Daniele Oriti
Abstract
We focus on three distinct lines of recent developments: edge modes and boundary charges in gravitational physics, relational dynamics in classical and quantum gravity, and quantum reference frames. We argue that these research directions are in fact linked in multiple ways, and can be seen as different aspects of the same research programme. This research programme has two main physical goals and one general focus, as well as broader conceptual implications. The physical goals are to move beyond the two idealizations/approximations of asymptotic or closed boundary conditions in gravitational physics and of ideal reference frames (coded in coordinate frames or gauge fixings), thus achieving a more realistic modelling of (quantum) gravitational physical phenomena. These two goals combine to identify a key open issue: a proper characterization of physical covariance, i.e. covariance across fully physical (as opposed to idealized) reference frames. The broader conceptual implications concern the influence of observers in physics and possible physical limits to objectivity.
Submitted
1 December 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2412.00993
Summary
Recent work on boundary charges, relational dynamics, and quantum reference frames addresses a shared problem: how to formulate physics when we abandon idealized assumptions about infinitely distant boundaries and perfect reference frames, leading to a deeper understanding of what 'physical covariance' means.
- Physicists studying gravity have been working separately on three problems—boundary effects, relational descriptions, and quantum reference frames—that turn out to be facets of one underlying challenge.
- Current gravitational theories assume unrealistic conditions (infinitely distant boundaries, perfect coordinate systems); the goal is to build realistic models that account for finite, physical constraints.
- This effort forces a reckoning with observer-dependence: if reference frames are physical objects, not perfect abstractions, then questions about objectivity and the role of observers become unavoidable.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.