AG-2024.12-1434·hep-ph·cross-listed: nucl-thquant-ph
Quantum stresses in the hydrogen atom
Authors
- Adam Freese
Abstract
Gravitational form factors are often interpreted as providing access to stresses inside hadrons, in particular through Fourier transforms of the form factors $D$ and $\bar{c}$. Some researchers, however, have expressed skepticism of this interpretation. I revisit the question, and argue that it is indeed appropriate to interpret these quantities as stress distributions. I consider the hydrogen atom's ground state as a familiar example, and use the pilot wave interpretation of quantum mechanics to give the distributions a clear meaning. A striking result is that $\bar{c}$ -- rather than $D$ -- quantifies the force law binding the system, which can be understood through Cauchy's first law of motion.
Submitted
12 December 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2412.09664
Summary
The author argues that gravitational form factors can legitimately be interpreted as stress distributions inside quantum systems, using the hydrogen atom as a test case and showing that one particular form factor captures the binding forces.
- Gravitational form factors D and c̄ can be meaningfully interpreted as stress distributions—not merely mathematical artifacts—when viewed through the pilot-wave interpretation of quantum mechanics.
- The form factor c̄ (not D as sometimes assumed) directly quantifies the force law that binds the system together, clarified through Cauchy's classical equations of motion applied to quantum systems.
- The hydrogen atom serves as a concrete, intuitive example where these abstract form factors have a clear physical meaning, potentially settling a long-standing debate about what gravitational measurements reveal about internal structure.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.