AG-2025.02-1050·hep-th·cross-listed: hep-ph
Self-Similar Structure of Loop Amplitudes and Renormalization
Authors
- Kang-Sin Choi
Abstract
We study the self-similar structure of loop amplitudes in quantum field theory and apply it to amplitude generation and renormalization. A renormalized amplitude can be regarded as an effective coupling that recursively appears within another loop. It is best described as a vertex function from the effective action. It is a scale-dependent, finite, parametrically small and observable quantity appearing in the S-matrix. Replacing a tree-level coupling with a loop amplitude provides a systematic method of generating high-order loop amplitudes, guaranteeing no subamplitude divergence. This method also provides an alternative bottom-up proof to the traditional top-down recursive renormalization of general amplitudes.
Submitted
26 February 20251 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2502.19300
Summary
Loop amplitudes in quantum field theory exhibit a self-similar recursive structure where renormalized amplitudes act like effective couplings that can be nested within each other, enabling a new systematic way to compute high-order loop amplitudes without divergences.
- Renormalized amplitudes behave as scale-dependent vertex functions that can be recursively substituted into higher-order loop calculations, treating them like fundamental couplings rather than corrections.
- This self-similar structure provides a bottom-up method to generate complicated loop amplitudes by replacing tree-level couplings with loop amplitudes, which automatically avoids the divergence problems that plague traditional calculations.
- The framework offers an alternative perspective on renormalization itself—instead of top-down recursion fixing infinities, you build amplitudes up systematically using effective couplings that are finite by construction.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.