AG-2025.02-505·physics.class-ph·cross-listed: gr-qc
Gravitational friction from d'Alembert's principle
Authors
- C. Ortiz
- R. S. Khatiwada
Abstract
The least action principle played a central role in the development of modern physics. A major drawback of the principle is that its applicability is limited to holonomic constraints. In the present work, we investigate the energy lost by particles as a result of the gravitational interaction in a homogeneous low-density medium subject to non-holonomic constraints. We perform the calculation for an arbitrary particle and outline the specific result for photons. The energy lost is calculated from first principles based on the principle of virtual work and the d'Alembert principle. Under the formalism mentioned above, the dissipative nature of the effect is established. Furthermore, we show that the results agree with an alternative derivation based on continuum mechanics and the Euler-Cauchy stress principle.
Submitted
11 February 20251 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2502.07174
Summary
Particles lose energy when gravitating through a medium with non-holonomic constraints; the authors derive this dissipative effect using d'Alembert's principle and show it matches continuum-mechanics predictions.
- The least action principle usually fails for non-holonomic constraints (like rolling without slipping), but d'Alembert's principle can extend energy-loss calculations to these cases.
- Gravitational interactions in low-density media cause measurable energy dissipation, a result derived rigorously from virtual work rather than assumed.
- The agreement between two independent approaches—virtual work and continuum mechanics—strengthens confidence that gravitational friction is a real, calculable effect in constrained systems.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.