AG-2025.02-575·physics.hist-ph·cross-listed: gr-qcmath-ph
Hyperdeterminism? Spacetime 'Analyzed'
Authors
- Lu Chen
- Tobias Fritz
Abstract
When modelling spacetime and classical physical fields, one typically assumes smoothness (infinite differentiability). But this assumption and its philosophical implications have not been sufficiently scrutinized. For example, we can appeal to analytic functions instead, which are also often used by physicists. Doing so leads to very different philosophical interpretations of a theory. For instance, our world would be 'hyperdeterministic' with analytic functions, in the sense that every field configuration is uniquely determined by its restriction to an arbitrarily small region. Relatedly, the hole argument of general relativity does not get off the ground. We argue that such an appeal to analytic functions is technically feasible and, conceptually, not obviously objectionable. The moral is to warn against rushing to draw philosophical conclusions from physical theories, given their drastic sensitivity to mathematical formalisms.
Submitted
16 February 20251 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2502.11004
Summary
By replacing the standard assumption that spacetime is infinitely smooth with the requirement that it's analytic, the authors show we'd get a deterministic universe where tiny patches of spacetime determine everything—and philosophical puzzles like Einstein's hole argument vanish.
- Physics theories are more sensitive to their mathematical scaffolding than we usually admit; switching from 'smooth' to 'analytic' functions dramatically changes what the theory says about determinism and uniqueness.
- Under analyticity, the universe becomes hyperdeterministic: knowing all field values in any small region completely fixes the entire spacetime configuration, eliminating indeterminism that smooth formulations allow.
- This work cautions against extracting philosophical conclusions (like underdetermination in general relativity) from physical equations without examining whether the math itself encodes hidden assumptions.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.