The AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project VII: Satellite quenching in zoom-in simulation of a Milky Way-mass halo

R. Rodríguez-Cardoso; S. Roca-Fàbrega; Minyong Jung; Thinh H. Nguyen; Ji-hoon Kim; Joel Primack; Oscar Agertz; Kirk S. S. Barrow; Jesus Gallego; Kentaro Nagamine; Johnny W. Powell; Yves Revaz; Hector Velázquez; Anna Genina; Hyeonyong Kim; Alessandro Lupi; Tom Abel; Renyue Cen; Daniel Ceverino; Avishai Dekel; Boon Kiat Oh; Thomas R. Quinn

doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.05844

← Recent

AG-2025.05-101·astro-ph.GA·cross-listed: astro-ph.CO

The AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project VII: Satellite quenching in zoom-in simulation of a Milky Way-mass halo

Authors

R. Rodríguez-Cardosofor The AGORA Collaboration
S. Roca-Fàbregafor The AGORA Collaboration
Minyong Jungfor The AGORA Collaboration
Thinh H. Nguyenfor The AGORA Collaboration
Ji-hoon Kimfor The AGORA Collaboration
Joel Primackfor The AGORA Collaboration
Oscar Agertzfor The AGORA Collaboration
Kirk S. S. Barrowfor The AGORA Collaboration
Jesus Gallegofor The AGORA Collaboration
Kentaro Nagaminefor The AGORA Collaboration
Johnny W. Powellfor The AGORA Collaboration
Yves Revaz

for The AGORA Collaboration

Hector Velázquezfor The AGORA Collaboration

Anna Geninafor The AGORA Collaboration

Hyeonyong Kimfor The AGORA Collaboration

Alessandro Lupifor The AGORA Collaboration

Tom Abelfor The AGORA Collaboration

Renyue Cenfor The AGORA Collaboration

Daniel Ceverinofor The AGORA Collaboration

Avishai Dekelfor The AGORA Collaboration

Boon Kiat Ohfor The AGORA Collaboration

Thomas R. Quinnfor The AGORA Collaboration

Abstract

Context: Satellite galaxies experience multiple physical processes when interacting with their host halos, often leading to the quenching of star formation. In the Local Group (LG), satellite quenching has been shown to be highly efficient, affecting nearly all satellites except the most massive ones. While recent surveys are studying Milky Way (MW) analogs to assess how representative our LG is, the dominant physical mechanisms behind satellite quenching in MW-mass halos remain under debate. Aims: We analyze satellite quenching within the same MW-mass halo, simulated using various widely-used astrophysical codes, each using different hydrodynamic methods and implementing different supernovae feedback recipes. The goal is to determine whether quenched fractions, quenching timescales and the dominant quenching mechanisms are consistent across codes or if they show sensitivity to the specific hydrodynamic method and supernovae (SNe) feedback physics employed. Methods: We use a subset of high-resolution cosmological zoom-in simulations of a MW-mass halo from the multiple-code AGORA CosmoRun suite. Results: We find that the quenched fraction is consistent with the latest SAGA survey results within its 1$σ$ host-to-host scatter across all the models. Regarding quenching timescales, all the models reproduce the trend observed in the ELVES survey, LG observations, and previous simulations: the less massive the satellite, the shorter its quenching timescale. All our models converge on the dominant quenching mechanisms: strangulation halts cold gas accretion and ram pressure stripping is the predominant mechanism for gas removal, particularly effective in satellites with $M_* < 10^8\, M_\odot$. Nevertheless, the efficiency of the stripping mechanisms differs among the codes, showing a strong sensitivity to the different SNe feedback implementations and/or hydrodynamic methods employed.

Submitted

9 May 20251 year ago

Version

v1

License

CC-BY-4.0

DOI

10.48550/arXiv.2505.05844

Cite this preprint

BibTeX RIS

Imports into BibLaTeX, Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote.

PDF

Open PDF

Opens in a new tab · v1.

Chat with this PDF

Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.

Community

Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.