How Many Times Should We Matched Filter Gravitational Wave Data? A Comparison of GstLAL's Online and Offline Performance

Prathamesh Joshi; Wanting Niu; Chad Hanna; Rachael Huxford; Divya Singh; Leo Tsukada; Shomik Adhicary; Pratyusava Baral; Amanda Baylor; Kipp Cannon; Sarah Caudill; Michael W. Coughlin; Bryce Cousins; Jolien D. E. Creighton; Becca Ewing; Heather Fong; Richard N. George; Shaon Ghosh; Patrick Godwin; Reiko Harada; Yun-Jing Huang; Cody Messick; Soichiro Morisaki; Debnandini Mukherjee; Alexander Pace; Cort Posnansky; Anarya Ray; Surabhi Sachdev; Shio Sakon; Urja Shah; Ron Tapia; Koh Ueno; Aaron Viets; Leslie Wade; Madeline Wade; Zach Yarbrough; Noah Zhang

doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.23959

← Recent

AG-2025.05-379·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.COastro-ph.IM

How Many Times Should We Matched Filter Gravitational Wave Data? A Comparison of GstLAL's Online and Offline Performance

Authors

Prathamesh Joshi
Wanting Niu
Chad Hanna
Rachael Huxford
Divya Singh
Leo Tsukada
Shomik Adhicary
Pratyusava Baral
Amanda Baylor
Kipp Cannon
Sarah Caudill
Michael W. Coughlin
Bryce Cousins
Jolien D. E. Creighton
Becca Ewing
Heather Fong
Richard N. George
Shaon Ghosh
Patrick Godwin
Reiko Harada
Yun-Jing Huang
Cody Messick

Soichiro Morisaki

Debnandini Mukherjee

Alexander Pace

Cort Posnansky

Anarya Ray

Surabhi Sachdev

Shio Sakon

Urja Shah

Ron Tapia

Koh Ueno

Aaron Viets

Leslie Wade

Madeline Wade

Zach Yarbrough

Noah Zhang

Abstract

Searches for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences employ a process called matched filtering, in which gravitational wave strain data is cross-correlated against a bank of waveform templates. Data from every observing run of the LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA collaboration is typically analyzed in this way twice, first in a low-latency mode in which gravitational wave candidates are identified in near-real time, and later in a high-latency mode. Such high-latency analyses have traditionally been considered more sensitive, since background data from the full observing run is available for assigning significance to all candidates, as well as more robust, since they do not need to worry about keeping up with live data. In this work, we present a novel technique to use the matched filtering data products from a low-latency analysis and re-process them by assigning significances in a high-latency way, effectively removing the need to perform matched filtering a second time. To demonstrate the efficacy of our method, we analyze 38 days of LIGO and Virgo data from the third observing run (O3) using the GstLAL pipeline, and show that our method is as sensitive and reliable as a traditional high-latency analysis. Since matched filtering represents the vast majority of computing time for a traditional analysis, our method greatly reduces the time and computational burden required to produce the same results as a traditional high-latency analysis. Consequently, it has already been adopted by GstLAL for the fourth observing run (O4) of the LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA collaboration.

Submitted

29 May 202511 months ago

Version

v1

License

CC-BY-4.0

DOI

10.48550/arXiv.2505.23959

Cite this preprint

BibTeX RIS

Imports into BibLaTeX, Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote.

PDF

Open PDF

Opens in a new tab · v1.

Summary

Researchers developed a shortcut to gravitational wave detection that reuses fast real-time filtering results instead of running the expensive computation twice, achieving the same sensitivity while cutting computational costs dramatically.

Gravitational wave searches currently analyze data twice—once quickly for alerts, once thoroughly for accuracy—but matched filtering (the computationally expensive step) dominates the workload.
The new method recycles the filtering results from the fast run and reassigns statistical significance using the full dataset, eliminating the need for a redundant second filtering pass.
Tests on real LIGO-Virgo data confirm this hybrid approach matches traditional high-latency sensitivity while reducing computing time substantially, and it's already being used in the latest detector observing run.

curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5

Chat with this PDF

Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.

Community

Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.