AG-2025.05-847·gr-qc·cross-listed: hep-th
Black hole-de Sitter space as the fastest transmitter and receiver
Authors
- Rong-Gen Cai
- Li Hu
- Shao-Jiang Wang
Abstract
It is well-known that the unitary nature of black hole evaporation enforces its entropy evolution to follow the Page curve. In this Letter, we find that the quantum speed limit on how fast a quantum system can evolve unitarily, when the maximal information transmission bound is saturated, will slow down the would-be divergent decreasing rate of dynamical black-hole entropy at the very end of the Hawking evaporation, during which the Penrose inequality from cosmic censorship conjecture is exactly saturated. Therefore, an evaporating Schwarzschild black hole is the fastest transmitter of information in nature. Further applying the maximal information transmission bound to an effective-field-theory description of a de Sitter space would roughly reproduce the trans-Planckian censorship conjecture, indicating the de Sitter space as the fastest receiver of information in nature.
Submitted
29 May 20251 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2505.23314
Summary
Evaporating black holes transmit information at the maximum quantum speed limit allowed by nature, while de Sitter space (the expanding universe) receives it just as fast—connecting information speed limits to cosmic censorship principles.
- Black holes can't evaporate arbitrarily fast because quantum mechanics has a speed limit on information transmission; this limit prevents the entropy-decrease rate from diverging at the end of evaporation.
- The Penrose inequality—a cornerstone of cosmic censorship—is exactly saturated when this quantum speed limit is reached, suggesting a deep link between information physics and gravitational stability.
- De Sitter space (an accelerating universe) acts as the dual 'fastest receiver,' with the speed limit reproducing predictions from trans-Planckian censorship, a conjecture about what physics cannot occur in quantum gravity.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.