AG-2025.11-046·hep-ph·cross-listed: astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ex
Direct detection of solar chameleons with electron recoil data from XENONnT
Authors
- Guan-Wen Yuan
- Anne-Christine Davis
- Maurizio Giannotti
- Sunny Vagnozzi
- Luca Visinelli
- Julia K. Vogel
Abstract
We reassess prospects for direct detection of solar chameleons, in light of recent progress in modeling their production, and the availability of new XENONnT data. We show that the contribution from Primakoff production in the electric fields of electrons and ions dominates the electron recoil event rate, which is enhanced compared to earlier estimates based on magnetic conversion in the tachocline alone. We argue that the signal is governed by the effective coupling $β_{\text{eff}} \equiv β_γM_e^{-4}$, which encodes the combined effects of production and detection, where $β_γ$ and $M_e$ are the chameleon-photon (conformal) coupling and chameleon-electron disformal coupling scale, respectively. Setting the height of the chameleon potential to the dark energy (DE) scale $Λ\simeq 2.4\,{\text{meV}}$, we show that XENONnT electron recoil data set the upper limit $\log_{10}β_{\text{eff}}<-6.9$. This limit is independent of the conformal matter coupling $β_m$ and index $n$, and applies to the whole class of inverse power-law chameleons, well beyond the $n=1$ case usually studied. We comment on how future multi-target experiments and lower-threshold analyses could distinguish solar chameleons from other light (pseudo)scalar particles such as axions. Our work demonstrates that existing dark matter direct detection experiments can probe regions of parameter space relevant to screened DE models, providing complementary tests to astrophysical and fifth-force searches at no additional experimental cost.
Submitted
3 November 20256 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2511.01655
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.