AG-2025.11-140·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEhep-th
On the Bondi accretion of a self-interacting complex scalar field
Authors
- Dražen Glavan
- Alexander Vikman
- Tom Zlosnik
Abstract
Scalar fields with a global U(1) symmetry often appear in cosmology and astrophysics. We study the spherically-symmetric, stationary accretion of such a classical field onto a Schwarzschild black hole in the test-field approximation. Thus, we consider the relativistic Bondi accretion beyond a simplified perfect-fluid setup. We focus on the complex scalar field with canonical kinetic term and with a generic quartic potential which either preserves the U(1) symmetry or exhibits spontaneous symmetry breaking. It is well known that in the lowest order in gradient expansion the dynamics of such a scalar field is well approximated by a perfect superfluid; we demonstrate that going beyond this approximation systematically reduces the accretion rate with respect to the perfect fluid case. Hence, black holes can provide a way to distinguish a perfect fluid from its ultraviolet completion in form of the complex scalar field.
Submitted
6 November 20257 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2511.04650
Summary
When a quantum-like scalar field falls onto a black hole, its accretion rate differs measurably from simpler fluid models—offering a new way to distinguish fundamental fields from their effective-fluid approximations.
- Black holes accreting complex scalar fields (with self-interaction) pull in less material than perfect-fluid models predict, revealing the granularity hidden in smooth approximations.
- The researchers systematically computed corrections beyond the leading-order approximation, showing how microscopic field dynamics matter even in large-scale astrophysical flows.
- This result suggests black holes could act as cosmic laboratories for testing which theoretical descriptions—fundamental fields or effective fluids—actually govern exotic matter in nature.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.