AG-2025.12-446·hep-th·cross-listed: gr-qc
Dynamical Black Hole Emission
Authors
- David A. Lowe
- Larus Thorlacius
Abstract
Semiclassical black hole emission in four spacetime dimensions is studied using a non-local effective action. The field equations that determine the time-dependent renormalized stress tensor are solved numerically for a black hole formed by an ingoing null shock wave, and otherwise smooth initial data. We find that Hawking radiation is generated dynamically near the black hole horizon and freely propagates out to null infinity, resulting in an outgoing energy flux that builds up from zero at early retarded times before the black hole forms. This resolves the long-standing issue of pre-Hawking radiation, suffered by calculations based on a static approximation to the stress tensor in an Unruh state, and paves the way towards four-dimensional black hole evolution with semiclassical back-reaction included.
Submitted
18 December 20255 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2512.16480
Summary
Physicists simulated how black holes actually emit radiation by solving the full time-dependent equations rather than using static approximations, showing that Hawking radiation builds up naturally after the black hole forms rather than appearing mysteriously beforehand.
- The calculation uses a non-local effective action to track quantum effects near black hole horizons dynamically, avoiding the artificial assumption that the universe is in a static state.
- The radiation emerges naturally from the physics of the horizon itself—it doesn't exist before the black hole forms, which resolves a decades-old puzzle where naive static calculations predicted unphysical 'pre-Hawking' radiation.
- This opens the door to simulating how black holes actually shrink and evolve over time with quantum effects included, moving beyond idealized static scenarios.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.