AG-2025.12-763·physics.comp-ph·cross-listed: gr-qc
Fast Poisson brackets and constraint algebras in canonical gravity
Authors
- Will Barker
Abstract
In the study of alternative or extended theories of gravity, Dirac's Hamiltonian constraint algorithm is invaluable for enumerating the propagating modes and gauge symmetries. For gravity, this canonical approach is frequently applied as a means for finding pathologies such as strongly coupled modes; more generally it facilitates the reconstruction of gauge symmetries and the quantization of gauge theories. For gravity, however, the algorithm can become notoriously arduous to implement. We present a simple computer algebra package for efficiently computing Poisson brackets and reconstructing constraint algebras. The tools are stress-tested against pure general relativity and modified gravity, including the order reduction of general relativity at two loops.
Submitted
31 December 20254 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2512.25007
Summary
Researchers developed a computer tool that quickly calculates Poisson brackets—mathematical operations central to checking whether gravity theories are consistent and have the right symmetries—making it practical to analyze complex modified gravity theories.
- Dirac's constraint algorithm, which identifies problematic extra modes and hidden symmetries in gravity theories, has been too computationally difficult to apply to realistic theories; this software package makes it tractable.
- The tool automates tedious algebraic calculations (Poisson brackets) that physicists previously had to do by hand, enabling systematic exploration of alternative gravity theories.
- Testing on general relativity itself and its two-loop quantum corrections validates the approach, suggesting it can reliably catch pathologies in candidate new theories of gravity.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.