AG-2026.01-026·physics.gen-ph
Overlooked local interactions in the EPR Paradox
Authors
- N. O. Chudak
- O. S. Potiienko
- I. V. Sharph
- V. P. Smolyar
Abstract
Five objections to the conventional arguments underlying the EPR \enquote{paradox} are presented. It is shown that for entangled subsystems the formation of the post-measurement state necessarily involves local interactions affecting both subsystems, contradicting standard EPR assumptions. Correlations between measurements by remote apparatuses are shown to be consistent with relativistic principles. For entangled eigenstates of total momentum or total spin, eliminating redundant degrees of freedom in analogy with generalized Hamiltonian dynamics prevents the emergence of the EPR \enquote{paradox}. A different paradox is identified for a quantum charged particle, whose electric field is shown to be determined by potential configurations encoded in the quantum state rather than by actual measurement events.
Submitted
3 January 20264 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2601.04230
Summary
This paper argues that the EPR paradox rests on overlooked local interactions between entangled particles and measuring apparatus, and proposes that properly accounting for these interactions resolves the apparent tension with relativity.
- The standard EPR argument assumes measurement on one particle doesn't affect the other, but for entangled systems the post-measurement state actually requires local interactions at both subsystems, violating a key EPR premise.
- Correlations between distant measurements can be explained without spooky action at a distance by recognizing that total momentum or spin eigenstates have redundant degrees of freedom that, when eliminated, prevent the paradox from arising.
- For quantum charged particles, the electric field is determined by potential configurations encoded in the quantum state itself rather than by which measurement actually occurs—suggesting a different kind of apparent paradox lurks in quantum electromagnetism.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.