← Recent

AG-2026.01-617·astro-ph.IM·cross-listed: astro-ph.HEgr-qc

An autoencoder-based surrogate waveform model for quasi-circular binary-black-hole mergers

Authors

  • Anastasios Theodoropoulos
  • Nino Villanueva
  • Osvaldo Gramaxo Freitas
  • Tiago Fernandes
  • Solange Nunes
  • Alejandro Torres-Forne
  • Jose A. Font
  • Antonio Onofre
  • Jose D. Martin-Guerrero

Abstract

The generation of accurate waveforms from binary black hole (BBH) mergers is a major effort in Gravitational-Wave Astronomy. In recent years, machine-learning-based surrogate models for BBH waveforms have been proposed. Those offer the potential to dramatically accelerate waveform generation while maintaining accuracy competitive with that of traditional waveform approximants. In this work, we investigate the viability of autoencoders as generative models for gravitational-wave signals from quasi-circular BBH mergers. We introduce AESur3dq8, a novel surrogate waveform model based on autoencoders that enables the rapid and accurate construction of large template banks, producing millions of waveforms in under a second using modest computational resources. The model is trained on the numerical-relativity-informed surrogate NRHybSur3dq8 and subsequently fine-tuned using the SXS catalog of BBH simulations. We demonstrate that waveforms generated by AESur3dq8 achieve mismatches of order $10^{-4}$ with respect to Numerical Relativity waveforms, and that parameter estimation performed with these templates yields results fully consistent with those reported by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration for observed gravitational-wave events.

Submitted

30 January 20262 months ago

Version

v1

License

CC-BY-4.0

DOI

10.48550/arXiv.2602.00203

Cite this preprint

Imports into BibLaTeX, Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote.

PDF

Open PDF

Opens in a new tab · v1.

Chat with this PDF

Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.

Community

Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.