AG-2026.02-1355·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-ex
Extracting a Toponium Signal at the LHC with Spin and Quantum Information Tools
Authors
- Laura Antozzi
- Esteban Chalbaud
- Frédéric Déliot
- Federica Fabbri
- Miguel C. N. Fiolhais
- Benjamin Fuks
- António Onofre
- Martin White
- Pengxuan Zhu
Abstract
We investigate near-threshold top-antitop production at the LHC, focusing on the impact of toponium formation on spin correlations and quantum information properties of the final state. Considering the top-antitop system as a mixed two-qubit state, we reconstruct spin density matrices via quantum tomography and evaluate several observables including some inspired by quantum information. We then compare their sensitivity in discriminating toponium effects from top-antitop production without these effects. Our results demonstrate that combining these variables is expected to significantly enhance sensitivity to toponium effects, bringing new ways to explore these subtle features.
Submitted
26 February 20262 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2602.23426
Summary
Physicists propose using quantum information tools to detect rare bound states of top quarks at the LHC by analyzing spin correlations as if the system were a quantum computer's qubits.
- Near the production threshold, top-antitop pairs can briefly form a bound state called toponium—a rare phenomenon that leaves subtle fingerprints in spin correlations.
- Treating the top-antitop system as a two-qubit quantum state and reconstructing its properties (quantum tomography) reveals signatures invisible to traditional measurements.
- Combining quantum-inspired observables outperforms conventional methods at spotting toponium, offering experimentalists a new toolkit to hunt for this elusive state in LHC data.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.