AG-2026.04-1226·hep-ph
Bayesian inference constraints on jet quenching across centrality, beam energy, and observable classes in LHC heavy-ion collisions
Authors
- Dongguk Kim
- Dongjo Kim
- Jeongsu Bok
- Beomkyu Kim
Abstract
Jet quenching in heavy-ion collisions probes parton energy loss in the quark--gluon plasma (QGP), but the extracted transport properties may not be universally constrained across centrality, beam energy, and observable class. In this work, we perform an analysis of the compatibility and predictive transferability of Bayesian constraints obtained from a six-parameter JETSCAPE effective energy-loss model across these subsets. The model is calibrated to charged-hadron and inclusive-jet data from ALICE, ATLAS, and CMS in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02$ and $2.76$ TeV. We find that centrality-dependent posteriors are largely compatible, whereas beam-energy and observable-class splits exhibit moderate shifts within overlapping credible regions, indicating that posterior overlap alone does not guarantee predictive universality. This is further examined by propagating subset posteriors to complementary datasets without refitting, where predictive performance varies across subsets. These results indicate that different observables probe distinct aspects of jet--medium interactions and motivate leading-hadron-selected jet observables to bridge hadron-biased and jet-inclusive constraints.
Submitted
17 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.15737
Summary
Physicists used Bayesian analysis to extract how particles lose energy in the quark-gluon plasma from LHC collisions, but found the inferred transport properties shift subtly depending on collision energy and which particles you measure—suggesting different observables reveal different physics.
- A Bayesian model calibrated to multiple LHC datasets can extract consistent energy-loss parameters across different collision densities, but struggles when comparing different collision energies or particle types.
- Overlapping confidence regions between different data subsets don't guarantee a model will make accurate predictions on new data—a practical cautionary tale for fitting complex physics models.
- The mismatch hints that inclusive jets and individual hadrons probe the plasma's structure in fundamentally different ways, implying future measurements should blend these two approaches.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.