AG-2026.04-266·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.HE
Testing the Kerr hypothesis beyond the quadrupole with GW241011
Authors
- Rimo Das
- N. V. Krishnendu
- M. Saleem
- Chandra Kant Mishra
- K. G. Arun
Abstract
All multipole moments of a Kerr black hole are uniquely determined by its mass and spin. Gravitational wave observations can test this prediction by measuring spin-induced multipole moments imprinted on the inspiral phase of compact binary mergers. In this Letter, we show that the recently reported compact binary coalescence GW241011 enables a simultaneous test of deviations in the spin-induced quadrupole and octupole moments of the binary components from their black hole values. We find no evidence for deviations from the Kerr prediction and place the first constraints on spin-induced octupole moments of the compact binary. This approach complements tests of the Kerr nature of compact binary merger remnants based on quasinormal mode measurements in the ringdown phase.
Submitted
10 April 20262 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.09828
Summary
A gravitational wave signal from a binary merger provides the first measurements of whether black holes have the expected octupole moment—a higher-order shape property—in addition to the quadrupole, finding no deviations from Einstein's Kerr black hole prediction.
- Kerr black holes have all their properties determined by just mass and spin; this paper tests whether observed black holes match that prediction by measuring higher-order multipole moments during the inspiral phase.
- GW241011 allowed simultaneous constraints on both quadrupole (previously tested) and octupole (never before constrained) deviations, providing a new fingerprint for black hole nature.
- This test complements existing ringdown-based methods and opens a new observational window—the early coalescence phase—for testing whether astrophysical black holes truly match Einstein's predictions.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.