What specific evidence rules out modified gravity instead of dark energy?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

Distinguishing Dark Energy from Modified Gravity The honest answer is: the evidence doesn't yet decisively rule out modified gravity in favor of dark energy , but new observational tools are starting to break the degeneracy. The Degeneracy Problem The core challenge is that modified gravity theories and dark energy can produce identical cosmological signatures. When you measure how structure grows or how light bends in the universe, both scenarios can fit the data equally well [AG 2024.04 266]. This isn't a minor quirk—it's "an important limitation" of the standard approach [AG 2024.04 266]. The reason is mathematical: a modification to gravity's strength can mimic the effects of an additional invisible component pushing expansion faster. Breaking the Tie: Gravitational Redshift and Gravitational Waves Two observational handles are emerging: Gravitational redshift measurements offer a way forward. Unlike growth of structure and lensing data, which conflate modified gravity with dark forces, gravitational redshift measurements can directly distinguish between them. The upcoming Square Kilometre Array should provide enough precision to separate, for example, modified gravity models (like generalized Brans Dicke theory) from fifth force scenarios (coupled quintessence) [AG 2024.04 266]. This matters because fifth forces would violate fundamental principles like the equivalence principle in detectable ways. Gravitational wave propagation is another lever. Modified gravity theories predict specific damping patterns for gravitational waves as they travel across the universe—patterns distinct from what dark energy predicts [AG 2025.09 201]. Recent datasets from DESI and the Dark Energy Survey are starting to reveal these subtle differences [AG 2025.09 201]. The Laboratory Constraint On smaller scales, laboratory tests have ruled out some modified gravity candidates. The Chameleon theory—an ultra light scalar field proposed as dark energy—predicts a fifth force detectable in precision experiments [AG 2024.05 318]. A levitated force sensor test found no such force, decisively ruling out the basic Chameleon model [AG 2024.05 318]. More broadly, if quintessence drives acceleration, the data favor non minimally coupled scalars that would produce detectable fifth forces on smaller scales—yet we don't observe them [AG 2025.04 158]. This suggests either modified gravity is the answer, or the dark energy scenario requires additional new physics to hide the fifth force. Current Status Standard $\Lambda$CDM (a cosmological constant) still fits observations better than most modified gravity alternatives tested so far [AG 2024.12 284], but recent hints of evolving dark energy in DESI and supernovae data have reopened the debate [AG 2025.04 158]. The game is not over; the next generation of cosmological surveys will be decisive.