Can tunneling through classical barriers explain crack growth in ceramics that classical MD predicts should be immobile?

This is a fascinating question that sits at the intersection of fracture mechanics and quantum mechanics, but I need to be direct: the preprints provided don't address crack growth in ceramics specifically, and they don't examine whether quantum tunneling can overcome the immobility barriers that classical MD predicts.

Here's why the gap matters:

The preprints discuss tunneling in idealized quantum systems—ultracold atoms in optical lattices [AG-2024.06-1690], model double-wells [AG-2024.02-1488, AG-2024.02-1897], hydrogen-bonded protons [AG-2025.10-1656]—and tunneling dynamics in abstract Hamiltonians [AG-2024.01-1544]. One paper [AG-2024.04-1576] does propose combining quantum-informed modeling (DFTB+MBD) with classical mechanics for materials, which *could* in principle capture tunneling contributions to fracture, but it doesn't specifically test crack propagation or compare against the MD immobility problem you're asking about.

The core physics question you're raising is real: if classical molecular dynamics predicts a crack should be pinned by a potential energy barrier, could quantum tunneling of atoms at the crack tip allow gradual growth at stresses below the classical threshold? That would require:

1. Calculation of tunneling rates through realistic crack-tip barriers in ceramics

2. Comparison of those rates against classical MD predictions of immobility

3. Validation against experimental crack-growth kinetics in the sub-threshold regime

None of these appear in the archive excerpt. You'd need materials-specific fracture mechanics papers that actually simulate cracks with quantum effects included.