Would a detector combining both single-electron and 4–6 pair thresholds outperform either approach alone?

Your question asks whether a hybrid detector—one sensitive to both single-electron excitations *and* 4–6 electron-hole pair ionization events—would outperform either threshold alone. The preprints provided don't directly address detector hybridization, but I can extract relevant context.

The key insight comes from understanding what each threshold regime detects. Low single-electron thresholds (meV scale) are optimized for rare nuclear recoils from light dark matter or neutrinos, where energy deposits are tiny [AG-2024.05-2478, AG-2024.04-1584]. By contrast, the 4–6 electron-hole pair signature emerges when relativistic particles scatter in silicon and excite collective plasma modes; this regime peaks around that energy range and is *naturally* better for detecting high-velocity beyond-Standard-Model particles like millicharged particles [AG-2024.02-1255].

A combined detector would, in principle, gain complementary sensitivity: meV thresholds catch low-recoil events missed by higher-threshold devices, while the 4–6 pair channel efficiently tags a different particle population (fast, lightly ionizing). However, the archives don't analyze whether the noise floor, dead time, or false-positive rate of running both channels simultaneously would degrade overall performance, nor do they discuss the practical engineering tradeoffs of a unified device.

The provided preprints don't directly evaluate hybrid single-electron plus multi-pair detector performance or compare their combined reach to single-threshold alternatives.