Could quantum wavefunction peaks enable information transfer without violating causality constraints?

This is a genuinely subtle question that touches on one of the deepest tensions in physics — the interplay between quantum mechanics's apparent non-locality and relativity's ban on faster-than-light signalling.

The Core Tension

The archive shows that wavefunctions *do* exhibit apparent causality violations in rigorous mathematical treatments. Most strikingly, relativistic wavefunctions that are strictly localized at one moment in time can develop tails outside the future light cone at later times [AG-2024.04-1826]. This looks like information traveling faster than light — a direct threat to causality.

However, the key word is "apparent." The actual transfer of *usable information* is far more constrained than the mathematics alone suggests.

Why Wavefunction Peaks Don't Enable Signalling

Two mechanisms protect causality despite the mathematical appearance of violation:

1. Collapse and probability suppression: The Schrödinger-Newton model (which couples gravity to quantum dynamics) provides a concrete case study. Although it is constructed non-relativistically and permits superluminal effects mathematically, detailed probability calculations show that the chance of successfully transmitting a bit faster than light *decreases sharply with system size and mass* [AG-2025.12-539]. In other words: yes, the equations permit it, but nature suppresses the success rate exponentially as objects become larger or heavier. This is why we never observe it.

2. Distinction between correlation and causation: Recent work using "quantum Liang information flow" clarifies that causality in quantum systems is fundamentally different from mere correlation — wavefunction peaks can correlate with distant events without enabling causal influence [AG-2024.03-2224]. A peak in one location may be correlated with a measurement outcome elsewhere, but you cannot *use* that peak to deliberately send a signal.

When Signalling Appears Possible — But Fails

One proposal involves deliberately controlling quantum wavefunction collapse to encode information [AG-2024.06-2346]. While this framework identifies a real phenomenon (measurement-induced entropy reduction and eigenstate selection), it faces a practical barrier: there is no demonstrated mechanism to reliably harness this for controlled, detectable signalling without violating the no-signalling principle when all sources of decoherence are accounted for.

Similarly, direct quantum coupling without field mediators *can* produce retrocausal effects [AG-2024.12-489], but only in regimes where the coupling is so weak that extracting a usable signal becomes impossible — the causality protection comes from noise overwhelming the signal.

The Broader Picture

Perfect wave transfer *can* occur in certain quantum systems (those with conformal invariance), but this describes the internal coherent evolution of a system, not information sent to a distant receiver who can act on it [AG-2024.08-523]. The math permits wavefunction peaks to propagate; physics ensures they cannot carry actionable information faster than light.

The provided preprints don't directly address whether engineered wavefunction peak geometries could beat this — that specific question lies beyond their scope.