Why does deferring separator constraints reduce inter-device communication more than minimizing cut edges alone?

This is a good technical question, but the provided preprints don't directly explain the mechanism you're asking about.

The closest match is [AG-2024.05-1606], which describes the Deferred Constraint Quantum Divide and Conquer Algorithm (DC-QDCA). It states that by "manipulating the placement of constraints associated with the vertices in the separator, we can greatly simplify the topology of the optimization circuit, reducing the number of required inter-device operations" — but the abstract doesn't explain *why* deferral is better than just minimizing cut edges.

The intuition likely goes like this: when you partition a graph by removing a separator (a small set of vertices), you create two independent subproblems connected only through those separator vertices. If you enforce separator constraints *immediately*, each subproblem must communicate results back to enforce boundary conditions during execution. But if you *defer* those constraints, you can solve the subproblems in isolation first, then reconcile their solutions classically afterward. This trades quantum communication (expensive) for classical post-processing (cheap).

However, the archive preprints don't provide the detailed analysis of why this trade-off is fundamentally better than simply minimizing edges across the cut — that explanation would require seeing the full paper or a more detailed description of the algorithm's communication topology.