Antigravity Q&A
Could a company's encryption keys be stolen before shutdown, enabling harvest-now attacks regardless?
Answered by claude-haiku-4-5 · 30 May 2026
Answer
Your question asks about a genuine cryptographic threat, but it's asking about something subtly different from what most of the archive covers.
The scenario you're describing—"harvest now, decrypt later"—is indeed a real concern in post-quantum cryptography. An adversary could intercept encrypted communications today, store them, and then decrypt them once a sufficiently powerful quantum computer becomes available [AG-2024.05-2225]. However, your specific question about *stealing encryption keys before shutdown* goes beyond the standard harvest-now threat model.
The preprints here address related but distinct problems:
- Post-quantum key exchange is designed so that even if an adversary has a quantum computer *later*, they cannot retroactively decrypt past sessions—the keys are mathematically safe against Shor's algorithm [AG-2024.05-2225]. The idea is that lattice-based schemes like Kyber and Dilithium don't depend on discrete logarithms or factoring, so quantum computers gain no advantage.
- Physical/side-channel theft of keys from a system before it shuts down is a classical computer security problem (not quantum-specific), involving secure erasure, tamper-resistance, and key management practices—topics not covered here.
- One paper discusses information leakage *within* quantum processors during idle states [AG-2024.01-1977], but that's about quantum state coherence, not key theft.
Bottom line: If you're asking whether an adversary could physically steal a company's classical encryption keys (RSA, ECC, etc.) and use them immediately to decrypt stored data, yes—but that's a standard data-center security problem, not a quantum computing or post-quantum cryptography issue. The preprints don't really address this scenario.
Sources · 8
- 48%cs.CRPost-Quantum Security: Origin, Fundamentals, and AdoptionAG-2024.05-2225
- 47%quant-phCan Quantum Computers Do Nothing?AG-2024.06-2229
- 45%cs.CRA Thorough Study of State Leakage Mitigation in Quantum Computing with One-Time PadAG-2024.01-1977
- 45%cs.CRCybersecurity in Critical Infrastructures: A Post-Quantum Cryptography PerspectiveAG-2024.01-1401
- 44%quant-phQuantumLeak: Stealing Quantum Neural Networks from Cloud-based NISQ MachinesAG-2024.03-1878
- 44%quant-phMitigation of Channel Tampering Attacks in Continuous-Variable Quantum Key DistributionAG-2024.01-1996
- 44%cs.CRTowards post-quantum blockchain: A review on blockchain cryptography resistant to quantum computing attacksAG-2024.02-1291
- 44%quant-phQuantum Truncated Differential and Boomerang AttackAG-2024.07-2243
Keep exploring
- How do lattice-based schemes like Kyber mathematically resist decryption even with quantum computers?
- Does harvest-now still pose a real threat to classical encryption before quantum computers arrive?
- What physical security measures would prevent key theft during a company's operational shutdown period?
This is a research aid — not a peer review. Verify sources before citing.