Does imposing different boundary conditions ever allow previously forbidden fermionic operators to become physical?

Your question touches on a deep aspect of quantum mechanics: whether the mathematical freedom in choosing boundary conditions can enlarge the space of physically realizable operators, particularly for fermions.

The short answer is yes, but with important caveats about what "physical" means.

Boundary Conditions and Operator Realizability

The most direct evidence comes from fermion systems at boundaries. When you impose boundary conditions on a fermionic system, you're not just constraining wave functions—you're selecting which self-adjoint extensions of the Hamiltonian are allowed [AG-2025.10-337]. Different self-adjoint extensions correspond to genuinely different quantum theories with different spectra and dynamics.

More striking: an odd number of fermions seems mathematically forbidden in ordinary relativistic field theory, yet the geometric approach to topological field theory suggests this prohibition might be relative to your choice of boundary structure [AG-2024.01-586]. The geometry of the boundary can change what fermionic operators make sense globally.

How Boundaries Enable New Fermionic States

Boundaries can stabilize fermionic operators that would be forbidden in the bulk. A recent example is a massive non-relativistic fermionic system that appears trivially gapped in the bulk, but develops huge vacuum degeneracy at its boundaries—residual entropy proportional to boundary area [AG-2025.01-843]. This degeneracy reflects new fermionic degrees of freedom localized to the boundary that don't exist in the infinite system.

Similarly, magnetic fields interacting with boundary conditions in fermionic systems can trigger phase transitions between states with different fermionic node structures [AG-2024.10-919], effectively making previously inaccessible fermionic configurations accessible.

The Self-Adjointness Requirement

Here's the catch: not every boundary condition makes an operator "physical." For a quantum operator to describe real measurements, its Hamiltonian must be self-adjoint—a mathematical requirement ensuring energy is real and evolution is unitary. Imposing the *wrong* boundary conditions can lead to non-self-adjoint Hamiltonians with complex spectra and exponential instabilities [AG-2024.04-164]. Nature doesn't allow those.

The framework of self-adjoint extensions [AG-2025.10-337] tells us which boundary conditions are physically valid: they form a discrete or continuous family, each giving a legitimate quantum theory. Within that family, different choices can indeed activate fermionic operators that seemed forbidden under other boundary conditions.

A Subtler Constraint: Operator Dimension Parity

There's also a global constraint on fermionic theories: Lorentz-invariant QFTs with fermions in four dimensions possess a hidden ℤ₄ symmetry if all operators can be assigned even dimensions [AG-2024.02-535]. This means some fermionic operators might be forbidden not by boundary conditions, but by deeper consistency with topological phases and baryon/lepton number conservation.

Why it matters: Boundary conditions are not mere mathematical bookkeeping—they're physical choices that can unlock new fermionic operators and ground states. But they must preserve self-adjointness and global symmetry constraints.

---

The preprints focus mainly on how boundaries *change* fermionic spectra and degeneracy rather than directly addressing whether specific forbidden operators become allowed; a more targeted paper on operator algebras and boundary-dependent selection rules would directly answer your question better.