Does clustering remain effective if the true signal isn't actually correlated across those measured dimensions?

This is a thoughtful question about the fundamental assumptions underlying clustering — you're asking whether clustering algorithms can still find meaningful structure even when the measured dimensions aren't actually correlated with the true underlying signal.

The provided preprints don't directly address this question. They focus on *how* to cluster efficiently (quantum speedups, new algorithms, theoretical properties of clustering in specific regimes), but they don't examine what happens when the correlation structure you assume doesn't match reality.

For a complete answer, you'd want literature on topics like:

• The "curse of dimensionality" in clustering — how noise and spurious correlations dominate in high dimensions when signal correlations are weak.
• Validation metrics that detect when clusters found are artifacts rather than meaningful structure (silhouette scores, stability analysis).
• Dimensionality reduction as a preprocessing step to isolate the dimensions where true signal *does* correlate.

If you're designing an experiment or analyzing data, the practical answer is: clustering will still produce output (it always does), but you need independent validation — synthetic tests, cross-validation against held-out data, or domain knowledge — to confirm the clusters aren't just statistical noise.