Why doesn't entanglement between qubits let classical bits simulate the same exponential speedup?

This is a great question that cuts to the heart of what makes quantum computers different from classical ones. The short answer: entanglement alone isn't enough—you also need "magic" [AG-2024.11-661].

Let me unpack that.

Entanglement ≠ Speedup

Entanglement—the spooky correlations between qubits—is necessary for many quantum speedups, but it's not sufficient. The clearest evidence comes from the Gottesman-Knill theorem [AG-2024.05-2303]: quantum circuits made entirely of Clifford gates can create arbitrary entanglement between qubits, yet a classical computer can still efficiently simulate them. Think of Clifford gates as a restricted toolkit that, despite enabling entanglement, leaves the underlying structure so orderly that a clever classical algorithm can track everything.

This means entanglement alone doesn't prevent classical simulation. A classical computer can efficiently track a highly entangled state *if the gates constraining that state are simple enough*.

What Actually Drives Speedups

When researchers analyzed famous quantum speedup algorithms—Grover search, quantum Fourier transform, phase estimation—they found something puzzling: standard measures of entanglement entropy don't consistently identify why these algorithms are faster than classical methods [AG-2024.11-661]. The honest conclusion from that study is that "known entropy inequalities do not suffice to identify the presence or absence of quantum speedups."

The missing ingredient is quantum "magic": operations that can't be captured by entanglement alone, specifically gates outside the Clifford group. Magic gates break the structural symmetries that classical algorithms exploit [AG-2024.11-661]. Without them, even exponentially entangled states remain classically tractable.

Why This Matters

The practical implication is stark: you can't achieve exponential quantum speedup by just entangling qubits with simple gates. You need gates that create a fundamentally different kind of quantum resource—one that resists efficient classical representation. This explains why quantum computers require careful gate design and why near-term devices with limited magic operations struggle to demonstrate advantage.

The provided preprints don't directly explain the information-theoretic reason *why* magic is necessary rather than entanglement alone, but they consistently show that entanglement is not the bottleneck for classical simulation—structure and gate type are.