Why do thermal corrections vanish at high accelerations instead of remaining present in General Relativity?

Your question touches on a subtle—and contentious—corner of relativistic physics. The short answer is that thermal effects *don't* simply vanish at high accelerations in General Relativity; rather, their *character changes* in ways that challenge our intuitions about temperature and equilibrium.

The Unruh Effect and Acceleration-Induced Thermality

When an observer accelerates through the quantum vacuum, they perceive a thermal bath of radiation—a phenomenon called the Unruh effect. Counterintuitively, this thermality *strengthens* at higher acceleration [AG-2024.09-315]. The temperature of the perceived bath scales directly with proper acceleration, so acceleration doesn't erase thermal signatures; it *generates* them where none existed in an inertial frame.

A key subtlety: this thermality is real for the *internal degrees of freedom* of an accelerated detector (like an atom's electronic state), but breaks down for the detector's center-of-mass motion. [AG-2025.09-037] shows that while the atom's internal energy can thermalize to the Unruh bath via emission and absorption, the center-of-mass degree of freedom *fails* the fluctuation-dissipation theorem and remains out of equilibrium. This is a reminder that "thermality" in relativistic contexts is more fragile and frame-dependent than in classical physics.

Thermal Analogies in Modified Gravity

In extended gravity theories (like scalar-tensor gravity), thermal language provides a powerful analogy for how deviations from General Relativity decay over cosmic history. [AG-2025.02-707] describes this convergence using heat dissipation in viscous fluids—thermal corrections in these theories *do* fade as the universe evolves, but this fade reflects the dynamical evolution of the scalar field, not a universal principle about acceleration.

Classical Zero-Point Radiation: A Cautionary Tale

Not all "thermal" effects survive scrutiny. [AG-2026.01-348] derives classical Juttner and Planck distributions for particles and waves undergoing finite acceleration phases—but crucially finds that acceleration through classical zero-point radiation *alone* does not produce thermalization. This suggests that naive thermal intuitions can mislead.

Acceleration as "Refrigeration"

Paradoxically, uniform acceleration in a thermal medium can *suppress* thermal equilibrium and enhance phase transitions—an effect linked to the Unruh temperature [AG-2025.01-643]. Here, acceleration mimics cooling rather than heating, again defying classical intuition.

---

The deeper issue: General Relativity has no single notion of "temperature" valid globally in curved spacetime. The Tolman effect [AG-2025.07-288] shows that extended systems in hydrostatic equilibrium across a gravitational potential gradient exhibit temperature gradients—yet they're in thermal equilibrium. This reveals a fundamental tension: classical thermodynamics assumes uniform temperature, but GR does not.

The preprints don't directly explain *why* thermal corrections vanish at high accelerations in particular; if you're asking whether there's a specific mechanism that suppresses thermal effects beyond some acceleration threshold, these papers don't quite address it.