Does the lapse function approach allow Komar mass to be defined without assuming symmetry?

Yes, the lapse function approach does allow Komar mass to be defined without assuming symmetry [AG-2025.09-142].

Traditionally, the Komar mass requires a *Killing vector field* — a special symmetry of spacetime that represents an infinitesimal motion leaving the geometry unchanged. This is a strong restriction: it applies only to static or stationary spacetimes, not to dynamical or generic configurations.

The key insight in the recent result is that you can replace the Killing vector with the *lapse function* — the geometric quantity that governs how fast time flows in your sliced description of spacetime [AG-2025.09-142]. The lapse times the unit normal to your spatial hypersurface gives you the "normal evolution vector," and from this you can construct a generalized Komar energy without any symmetry assumption whatsoever.

The trade-off is modest: the generalized energy equals ADM mass (the standard definition of total energy in general relativity) provided the 3-dimensional Einstein tensor—which measures spacetime curvature on your slice—decays fast enough at infinity [AG-2025.09-142]. This is a mild technical condition satisfied in physically realistic scenarios with black holes and other compact objects.

Why does this matter? It means you can now use Komar-like techniques to extract energy content from simulations of merging black holes, neutron star collisions, or other fully dynamical, asymmetric systems—situations where the old Komar approach simply didn't apply [AG-2025.09-142].

The broader context is that mass in general relativity has multiple competing definitions (Komar, ADM, Bondi) that agree under symmetry but diverge more generally [AG-2025.03-718], so this unification is conceptually valuable.