If curvature is 60× smaller in irrotational models, does this reduce the exotic matter requirement proportionally?

Your question hinges on a relationship that isn't actually established in these preprints. Let me explain why.

The papers discuss *reduced* spacetime curvature in certain models—for instance, [AG-2024.10-139] uses hyperconical universes with a "background curvature subtracted" from the perturbed metric, and [AG-2025.05-483] describes vacuum solutions where curvature effects are "highly suppressed." However, none of them quantify a 60× reduction or directly link curvature magnitude to exotic matter demand in a proportional way.

The deeper issue: exotic matter requirement and curvature reduction are not simply proportional. In general relativity, the relationship is more subtle. For example:

• Some models (like [AG-2024.05-317] with topological defects) achieve flat rotation curves *without* exotic matter by exploiting singular curvature geometries—curvature is concentrated and redirected, not necessarily reduced overall.

• Others ([AG-2025.05-483]) replace dark matter with purely geometric effects (varying Newton's coupling) where curvature is suppressed but no exotic matter appears at all, breaking any proportional scaling.

• Still others ([AG-2024.06-485]) use negative intrinsic curvature of spatial foliations to create mass deficits—a geometric trick where curvature *type* matters more than magnitude.

The bottom line: If you're asking whether a 60× smaller curvature *automatically* reduces exotic-matter needs by 60×, the answer is no—it depends entirely on the mechanism. Some models trade curvature for topology, others for field structure. You'd need to specify which "irrotational model" you mean.

None of these preprints directly compare curvature and exotic-matter scaling for a single model family.