How do latent-space symmetries differ when training on standard versus beyond-ΛCDM cosmological data?

Your question asks about a subtle comparison: how do the latent-space symmetries discovered by machine-learning models differ when they compress standard ΛCDM versus beyond-ΛCDM cosmological datasets?

The archive has directly relevant work on this. When a variational autoencoder (VAE) is trained on ΛCDM-only CMB temperature spectra, it discovers 5 independent latent parameters that correspond cleanly to well-known features: the position, height, and even-odd modulation of acoustic peaks, plus gravitational lensing [AG-2025.02-173]. But when the same VAE is trained to also include early dark energy (EDE) models—a key beyond-ΛCDM scenario—the latent space expands to 8 dimensions [AG-2025.02-173]. Crucially, one of those new latent parameters *entirely isolates the EDE effects* from the standard ΛCDM parameters, revealing a previously unknown degree of freedom in the CMB that the standard model alone could not expose [AG-2025.02-173].

A similar finding emerges from a more sophisticated approach using parameter-conditioned variational autoencoders (CVAEs), which align latent representations directly with cosmological parameters. Even when extrapolating beyond-ΛCDM scenarios, the learned latent space maintains a "physically meaningful structure" that mirrors cosmological parameters and their degeneracies [AG-2025.10-1676]. This suggests that the machine-learning model is capturing robust symmetries—constraints among physical quantities—that persist across model families rather than being artifacts of one framework.

In essence: the latent space is *bigger* for beyond-ΛCDM data (more dimensions needed), and it reveals *new independent directions* that standard ΛCDM leaves hidden in degeneracies. These aren't just more parameters; they reflect genuine new physics breaking symmetries present in the concordance model.