Is negative mass physically possible?

Negative mass—where gravity repels rather than attracts—remains purely theoretical and faces severe obstacles.

The closest the provided preprints come to addressing this is a discussion of energy condition violations. Quantum fields can violate the null energy condition (NEC), which would allow "negative energy" to exist temporarily [AG-2025.03-352]. However, there's a crucial distinction: negative energy density in quantum field theory is not the same as negative mass. Negative energy can appear in localized regions (like near a wormhole mouth) but the universe appears to have safeguards against accumulating too much of it over time and space [AG-2025.03-352].

Classical negative mass would violate fundamental conservation laws. In particular, a mass that repels all other matter (including itself) would break momentum conservation—a cornerstone of physics. One preprint explores a similar violation in a different context, treating dark matter as a preferred reference frame that attracts normal matter without reciprocating the attraction, and notes this requires fundamentally modifying Einstein's gravity to avoid logical inconsistencies [AG-2025.05-075].

The observational bar is also high. We have no direct evidence for negative mass particles, and any hypothetical heavy exotic particle (like a tachyon) would leave detectable traces, such as altering black hole evaporation rates—constraints that already rule out many speculative candidates [AG-2025.01-185].

Bottom line: These preprints don't directly address negative mass feasibility. The archive focuses on frontier cosmology, dark matter, and gravity modifications, but doesn't contain a substantive treatment of whether classical negative mass could exist.