Could a cosmic-scale $a_0$ explain dark energy without introducing new incompatibilities in the interpolation function?

Your question asks whether a cosmological-scale acceleration parameter $a_0$ (familiar from MOND theories of gravity) could explain dark energy while remaining consistent with standard interpolation functions. This is a genuinely interesting cross-pollination idea, though the archive addresses it obliquely rather than directly.

The $a_0$–Dark Energy Connection

The most relevant result comes from scale-invariant cosmology. Within the Scale-Invariant Vacuum (SIV) paradigm, researchers have derived a MOND-like relation $g \sim \sqrt{a_0 \, g_N}$ that naturally connects the MOND acceleration scale to the cosmological constant [AG-2025.02-028]. Remarkably, this framework yields $a_0 \approx 10^{-10} \, \mathrm{m \, s^{-2}}$—the observed MOND value—*and* $\Lambda_E \approx 1.8 \times 10^{-52} \, \mathrm{m^{-2}}$, which matches the dark energy scale. This suggests the two "mysterious" acceleration scales may be facets of the same underlying geometric structure rather than independent coincidences.

Compatibility with Interpolation Functions

The compatibility question is trickier. Standard MOND interpolation functions (like those in Modified Newtonian Dynamics) are designed to smoothly transition between Newtonian and deep-MOND regimes at galactic scales. Extending such functions to cosmological scales introduces potential tensions: they were calibrated for local structure, not the expanding universe [AG-2025.02-028].

However, several alternative dark energy models sidestep this by avoiding rigid interpolation altogether:

• Quintessence models naturally evolve with cosmic time, avoiding a single interpolation prescription. A quintessential scalar field coupled to gravity can mimic evolving dark energy without interpolation functions [AG-2024.04-150], and some versions remain consistent even when becoming phantom-like in the past.

• Scale-invariant approaches replace interpolation with conformal symmetry. The SIV paradigm generates both $a_0$ and $\Lambda$ from the same symmetry structure, so there's no separate "interpolation problem"—they're unified from the start [AG-2025.02-028, AG-2025.02-140].

• Non-perturbative quantum field models derive dark energy from strongly-coupled Higgs–Yang–Mills fields [AG-2025.05-197], yielding an equation of state with only tiny time-dependent corrections. This avoids hand-tuned interpolation functions by anchoring the result to fundamental field theory.

The Real Tension

The archive sources don't squarely address whether MOND-style interpolation functions can be extended to cosmology *without new incompatibilities*. What they show instead is that models which unify $a_0$ and dark energy (via scale invariance or quintessence) may bypass the interpolation question altogether by working from first principles at both scales. The SIV result is particularly suggestive: if $a_0$ and $\Lambda$ emerge from the same conformal structure, you don't need separate interpolation rules—one geometric framework covers both.

The preprints provided don't directly test whether standard MOND interpolation functions remain compatible with a cosmological dark energy sector.