Could a different gauge symmetry preserve the same mass ratios while altering CKM mixing angles?

This is a sophisticated question about whether alternative gauge symmetries could decouple mass ratios from mixing angles—in other words, preserve one while changing the other. Let me work through what the archive suggests.

The short answer: the papers show mass ratios and CKM mixing angles are *deeply* intertwined, but yes, different symmetry structures can shift this relationship.

How mass and mixing are normally linked

In the Standard Model, fermion masses and mixings both emerge from the same Yukawa interaction matrices, so they naturally correlate. The famous Cabibbo angle relation $\tan θ_C \approx \sqrt{m_d/m_s}$ [AG-2024.05-1256] exemplifies this coupling. But this is not inevitable—it depends on *which* symmetry you impose on the Yukawa sector.

Alternative symmetries reshape the connection

The papers show that different gauge structures can preserve mass ratios while altering mixing:

• Modified Fritzsch textures [AG-2024.05-1256] introduce asymmetry between specific matrix entries within an $SU(5)$ model with inter-family $SU(3)_H$ symmetry. This tweaks the Yukawa structure enough to fit data while keeping the mass-hierarchy intuition intact.

• Novel texture pairs [AG-2025.01-1436] propose a "geometric ansatz" based on Unitarity Triangle geometry, with two texture zeros per matrix. These encode different symmetry principles than the original Fritzsch form yet still match all four mass ratios *and* CKM observables simultaneously—showing that multiple symmetry choices can be compatible with the same data.

• Wilson operator dimension dependence [AG-2025.02-1110] suggests a completely different framework where masses emerge from non-perturbative mechanisms involving high-dimensional operators. The CKM matrix would then derive from the power-law dependence of these operators on gauge couplings, decoupling the *origin* of masses from the *origin* of mixing angles, even though both reflect the same underlying gauge structure.

The quantum gravity angle

Strikingly, [AG-2025.07-502] shows that asymptotically safe gravity (quantum gravity effects near the Planck scale) imposes *ultraviolet boundary conditions* on the CKM matrix that enforce approximate unitarity relations like $|V_{ud}|^2 + |V_{us}|^2 \approx 1$ [AG-2025.07-502]. This means mass ratios and mixings could be independently determined at low energies, yet *both* constrained by a single UV symmetry principle.

Why this matters

A gauge symmetry that preserves mass ratios while shifting CKM angles would reveal that flavor hierarchy and flavor mixing have *separate* physical origins—one rooted in (say) dimensional analysis of operator coefficients, the other in geometric or entanglement principles [AG-2024.10-1012]. This is a testable prediction: future precision measurements of unitarity triangle angles would distinguish between competing symmetry frameworks [AG-2025.01-1436].

The papers don't provide a complete catalog of all such symmetries, but they strongly suggest the answer is yes: gauge choices exist that uncouple these observables in principle.