Does lens-induced dispersion in modified gravity accumulate differently than the Yukawa mass effect from dark energy over cosmic distances?

Your question touches on a subtle but important distinction in how modified gravity theories affect light and gravitational waves over cosmic distances. Let me unpack what the archive says about these two effects.

Lens-induced dispersion vs. Yukawa effects

Lens-induced dispersion (LID) is a frequency-dependent phase shift that gravitational waves acquire as they propagate through inhomogeneous spacetime in modified gravity theories [AG-2024.11-179, AG-2025.11-226]. This happens because deviations from general relativity introduce effective mass terms for gravitational waves; when those waves pass near massive structures (lenses), different frequencies travel at slightly different speeds, causing the waveform to "disperse" — much like white light splitting into a rainbow through a prism [AG-2025.11-226].

By contrast, the Yukawa potential (a common phenomenological modification to gravity at intermediate scales) modifies the static gravitational field itself, weakening its strength at certain distances. This affects both how masses attract and how light bends around them, but it does *not* inherently create frequency-dependent effects on propagating waves.

Do they accumulate differently?

Yes, crucially. LID accumulates *along the path* of the gravitational wave through inhomogeneous regions — the effect compounds as the wave encounters successive massive structures and encounters lensing by matter clumps [AG-2024.11-179]. The dispersion signature is encoded directly in the waveform phase, and becomes more pronounced over cosmological distances because small deviations compound [AG-2024.11-179].

A Yukawa-type modification, by contrast, modifies the *background* gravitational potential everywhere. It affects deflection angles and lensing probabilities in a way that scales with the integrated gravitational potential along the line of sight, but it doesn't naturally produce frequency-dependent phase shifts unless the theory also contains additional structure (like scalar or vector fields coupled to matter) [AG-2025.11-226].

Why this matters

These differences offer a way to disentangle modified gravity from other dark-sector models. The standard method — combining growth-of-structure measurements with lensing — can't easily distinguish between modifications to gravity and dark-matter fifth forces [AG-2024.04-266]. But gravitational-wave dispersion is a *qualitatively different* signature: it's a direct probe of how the spacetime metric itself propagates, and screened theories (like symmetron gravity) show *enhanced* GW dispersion compared to both general relativity and simple scalar-tensor theories [AG-2025.11-226]. This makes GW propagation tests potentially more constraining than traditional lensing on their own.

The provided preprints don't directly compare accumulation rates of lens-induced dispersion versus Yukawa-mass effects in a single model — that comparison would require specifying a particular theory that incorporates both.