Does infrared sensitivity explain why angular correlations fail across all kinematic regions, or only near soft-collinear limits?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

On Angular Correlations and Infrared Sensitivity Your question touches on a crucial tension in precision QCD: infrared sensitivity is fundamental to describing collinear and soft collinear limits, but the underlying physics extends much more broadly. The archive shows this in two ways: Infrared behavior is localized, but incomplete correlation failures are global The failure of angular correlations specifically in soft collinear limits does have a clear infrared origin. When partons become nearly collinear—radiating at very small angles—their energy distributions become dominated by soft gluon emissions, which are infamously tricky to calculate. The EEC jet functions introduce non perturbative structure to capture this transition: a characteristic scale around 2.3 GeV marks where perturbative QCD breaks down and hadronization takes over [AG 2025.07 995]. However, the archive reveals a more complex picture. When we look at back to back limits (large angles, where you might expect infrared effects to vanish), the situation doesn't improve automatically. A recent analysis at N⁴LL accuracy found that even in this regime—where soft and collinear physics should decouple—current experimental data fail to constrain fundamental parameters like the Collins Soper kernel or the strong coupling [AG 2025.07 1515]. This suggests the breakdown isn't purely an infrared problem localized to small angles. Why the discrepancy matters One possibility the data hint at: the issue may be kinematic reach rather than physics type . Semi inclusive measurements in $e^+e^ $ annihilation show that a unified description can work when you simultaneously model both the sudakov (soft gluon dominated) and jet fragmentation regions [AG 2025.09 1156]. The key is a matching scheme that smoothly connects regions where different scaling behaviors dominate [AG 2025.12 1699]. In other words: infrared sensitivity concentrates the worst effects near collinear limits, but incomplete theoretical or experimental access can cause apparent failures across all angles if you don't properly account for how those limits communicate through renormalization group evolution. The provided preprints don't directly compare infrared sensitivity failure rates across all kinematic regions quantitatively.