Does the detectability horizon shrink or expand as cooling efficiency improves?

Your question asks whether improving cooling efficiency makes things *easier* or *harder* to detect—a subtle but important distinction that depends on what system you're studying.

The archive offers two complementary answers:

Cooling can reduce detectability. When axion cooling becomes more efficient in core-collapse supernovae, the proto-neutron star temperature drops, which suppresses axion emission itself [AG-2025.08-1368]. This creates a paradox: better cooling of the star means fewer axions to detect. The same logic applies to quark stars: bare quark stars cool so rapidly that they produce too little luminosity to match observations, whereas configurations with a hadronic crust (which cool more slowly) agree better with data [AG-2025.08-1231]. In both cases, the *detectability horizon shrinks* as cooling efficiency improves, because the source dims.

Cooling can also expand detectability in other contexts. In early-universe cosmology, efficient dark matter cooling before Big Bang Nucleosynthesis actually *reduces* the free-streaming horizon—the distance particles travel before decoupling—which enhances matter perturbations on smaller scales and creates more abundant clumps [AG-2024.08-1105]. This could expand the parameter space accessible to direct detection.

The key insight: there's no universal answer. Cooling efficiency affects detectability through two mechanisms—it dims the source, but it also changes the spatial distribution of whatever you're trying to detect. Whether the horizon expands or shrinks depends on which effect dominates in your particular system.