How do axion-like particle masses below versus above 100 MeV affect the optimal dump geometry differently?

# Axion Mass and Beam-Dump Geometry

The archives show that axion-like particle (ALP) mass critically determines which *production and decay mechanisms dominate*, which in turn reshapes the optimal dump design. Let me break this into the two regimes you're asking about.

Below 100 MeV: The "Blind Spot" and Near-Target Tracking

Particles below 100 MeV live long enough to escape a conventional dump's interaction region before decaying, yet short enough that they don't reach far-field detectors—creating a sensitivity gap [AG-2026.04-807]. This "blind spot" demands a geometry fundamentally different from heavier ALP searches: experiments like LDMX address it by placing tracking detectors *close to the production target* to catch decay products near their birthplace, rather than relying on a distant shielded detector [AG-2026.04-807].

The LUXE-NPOD experiment illustrates this trade-off concretely. It operates in the 10–350 MeV window and uses an "optical dump" concept—a photon beam on a thin target—optimized specifically for this mass range. The systematic study of dump geometry (target thickness, detector placement, shielding configuration) directly targets the short-lived, prompt-decay regime [AG-2025.07-1520].

Above 100 MeV: Cascade Production and Longer Decay Lengths

For heavier ALPs (GeV scale and above), the bottleneck shifts. These particles decay so slowly that they travel far downstream before producing visible decay products. This permits the classic "dump-and-distant-detector" geometry. But production itself changes: rather than relying solely on the primary beam striking the dump, the *full electromagnetic cascade* in the target becomes a significant ALP source [AG-2025.09-1415]. This finding—that secondary photons from showers generate order-of-magnitude enhancements—reshapes dump thickness and material choice to optimize cascade yield rather than just primary-beam coupling [AG-2025.09-1415].

The "Ceiling" Effect Across Both Regimes

Superimposed on both regimes is the "beam-dump ceiling": sensitivity improvements slow dramatically in the prompt-decay region once you've optimized detection statistics and backgrounds [AG-2024.01-1042]. This ceiling is largely *insensitive to dump geometry itself* and instead reflects fundamental physics—once coupling is large enough for efficient production, you're limited by event rates, not apparatus design [AG-2024.01-1042]. This means portability and simplicity become attractive for low-mass searches, whereas high-mass searches benefit more from scale and shielding sophistication.

In short: sub-100 MeV ALPs demand compact, near-target geometry to catch short-lived decays; above 100 MeV, longer lifetimes permit classical dump-plus-detector separation, and cascade optimization drives target design.