What happens to signal sensitivity when you condition on background residuals instead of searching for absolute deviations?

This is a thoughtful question about signal detection methodology, but it's phrased in a way that doesn't quite map onto the gravitational-wave science in this archive.

When you ask about "conditioning on background residuals instead of searching for absolute deviations," you're asking about a statistical choice in how to set up a detection problem. The preprints here address related but distinct topics: how to *model* backgrounds (stochastic vs. templated) [AG-2024.03-365], how to handle correlations when you bin data [AG-2026.02-282], how to design better test statistics using cross-detector consistency [AG-2025.04-450], and what happens when signal and background are both loud [AG-2024.03-474].

The closest conceptual match is [AG-2024.03-474], which shows that when you ignore the background's contribution to the total power, you underestimate the true signal-to-noise ratio by an order of magnitude. But that's about *accounting for* background strength in your likelihood, not about conditioning on residuals as a detection strategy per se.

If you're asking whether the archive contains a study explicitly comparing sensitivity gains from conditioning on background residuals versus absolute-deviation searches, it doesn't appear to.