Does ML preprocessing reduce cognitive load more effectively than changing the data representation modality itself?

This archive doesn't really address your question — it covers frontier quantum and physics applications, not general machine learning preprocessing versus representation modality trade-offs.

That said, I can briefly note what the papers *do* touch on: [AG-2024.06-2208] shows that *changing representation modality* (from symbolic math to visual circle notation for quantum states) reduces cognitive load in education. [AG-2024.02-1875] demonstrates that immersive VR as a representation modality helps humans understand complex AI-generated structures. These suggest representation modality can matter significantly — but neither directly compares preprocessing pipelines (feature normalization, dimensionality reduction, etc.) against modality shifts, which is what your question asks.

For a proper answer, you'd want papers from the machine learning or human-computer interaction literature that experimentally isolate these two factors.