How would Solar System precision tests constrain MOND if the acceleration threshold dropped to cosmic expansion scales?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

Solar System Tests and Cosmic Scale MOND: The Core Tension Your question hinges on a real problem: what happens if MOND's acceleration threshold $a 0$ were set by cosmic expansion rather than the currently assumed value of $10^{ 10}$ m/s²? The Current Bottleneck MOND works by proposing that gravity behaves differently below a critical acceleration $a 0$ [AG 2025.01 283]. At galactic scales, this threshold explains rotation curves without dark matter—a genuine success [AG 2025.05 332]. But the Solar System creates a severe constraint. Precise measurements of planetary orbits via Cassini radio tracking set an extremely tight limit on how much the Sun's gravitational field can deviate from Newton's inverse square law [AG 2026.02 407]. This matters because most MOND theories predict an "external field effect" (EFE) that would suppress MOND modifications in regions already embedded in a strong gravitational background, like our Solar System inside the Milky Way [AG 2024.10 033]. The Incompatibility Problem Here's the crux: the Solar System's quadrupole measurements (subtle deviations in the gravitational field's shape) require that MOND's transition from modified to Newtonian gravity be very sharp [AG 2024.01 118]. But galaxy rotation curves require a much gentler transition [AG 2024.01 118]. This is not a minor disagreement—it's an 8.7σ tension under standard assumptions [AG 2024.01 118]. If you pushed $a 0$ down to cosmic expansion scales ( $10^{ 18}$ m/s²), the problem would invert : the Solar System would sit even deeper in the Newtonian regime, relaxing Solar System constraints, but galaxy kinematics would now occur at accelerations where MOND barely activates. You'd trade one incompatibility for another. Why This Matters Shifting $a 0$ cosmologically doesn't resolve the core issue—it's not that the threshold is in the wrong place, but that MOND's transition function appears to have incompatible shapes when fit to different datasets [AG 2024.01 118]. A relativistic reformulation might help [AG 2026.01 159], but the archive doesn't directly address whether cosmic scale thresholds would break this deadlock. The provided preprints don't model what happens if $a 0$ tracks cosmic acceleration directly, so I can't give you a quantitative prediction for that scenario.