Does the type of collapsing matter fundamentally alter how quickly the apparent horizon can form relative to singularity formation?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

Yes, the type of collapsing matter fundamentally alters the timing of apparent horizon formation relative to singularity formation.

The key insight is that the dynamics of the apparent horizon—which depends on the matter's properties—determines whether and when the singularity becomes visible [AG-2025.08-394]. Different matter types produce different collapse geometries, and this directly controls the causal structure.

Here's what the archive shows:

Matter properties change horizon timing:

When you generalize beyond the classical Oppenheimer-Snyder model (uniform dust) to include electric charge, cosmological constants, or anisotropic pressure, the collapse dynamics shift measurably [AG-2025.06-253]. For instance, charge in a Reissner-Nordström collapse or a cosmological constant in AdS/dS spacetimes "significantly influence the collapse process" and the apparent horizon formation timeline [AG-2025.06-253]. Anisotropic matter (pressure varying with direction) can even produce a *double apparent-horizon phase* during collapse—a phenomenon absent in isotropic cases [AG-2025.12-429].

Singularity visibility depends on relative timing:

The critical question—whether a singularity is naked (visible) or hidden in a black hole—hinges on "the relative timing of formation of trapped surfaces and the singularity" [AG-2025.08-394]. For spherically symmetric collapse with general type-I matter, this relative timing is governed by whether outgoing null geodesics can escape from the central singularity [AG-2025.08-394]. Different matter equations of state produce different answers.

Nonhomogeneous collapse complicates the picture further:

When density isn't uniform, the formation of shell-crossing singularities (regions where mass shells intersect) can block access to parts of the spacetime and alter when the apparent horizon forms relative to these intermediate singularities [AG-2024.10-565].

The provided preprints do not directly compare quantitative horizon-formation timescales across a broad range of matter types, so a precise numerical answer (e.g., "scalar field horizons form 10% faster than dust horizons") isn't available here.