What happens to fusion performance if one modality has systematically higher false-positive rates on a specific glitch class?

Your question asks about fusion performance degradation when one modality has systematically higher false-positive rates on a specific glitch class — a practical problem in multi-sensor or multi-classifier systems.

The archives don't directly address this scenario. However, the preprints do illuminate the broader context:

What fusion strategies exist for glitch classification:

[AG-2024.01-345] describes an advanced classifier for LIGO's fourth observing run that "evaluate[s] different fusion strategies for multi-time window inputs" to handle multi-modal data more effectively than earlier single-view architectures. This suggests the field is actively developing ways to combine different input representations (time windows, frequency representations, etc.), but the abstract doesn't detail how imbalanced false-positive rates across modalities are handled.

Why this matters in practice:

When detectors hunt for rare astrophysical signals like gravitational waves, glitches can mimic or mask real events. If one classifier modality (say, tree-based models on metadata [AG-2026.04-243]) has a systematically higher false-positive rate on, say, "Scattered Light" glitches, then naively fusing its confidence scores with a more reliable image-based classifier could dilute overall performance — inflating false alarms and wasting detector time on follow-up analysis [AG-2024.03-419].

What the archive doesn't cover:

The provided preprints don't explicitly analyze how to weight or gate fusion when modalities have heterogeneous error profiles on specific glitch classes, nor do they discuss adaptive fusion strategies that might down-weight unreliable modalities for particular signal types. This would be a natural next step for robust multi-modal glitch filtering.